Skip to main content

Life-affirming Values Deserve Better than Ridicule

When leftist/progressives employ ridicule, they seek to destroy - ridicule demolishes.
When they employ sarcasm, they seek to destroy - mockery is destruction.
When they use the argument from intimidation - accusing their opponents of racism, or lack of compassion - they destroy.
When they engage "political correctness" - literally, banning the use of "politically incorrect" words, really, thoughts - they destroy.
When they attend speeches by opponents and shout them down so loudly their opponent cannot effectively speak, they are destroying.
When they riot, rampage, loot and burn, they are destroying - directly.

What they are doing is literally destroying thoughts in the minds of others - before those others can clarify and consider thoughts opposed to the leftists. They are actually doing battle inside the minds of their opponents, shutting down those minds before they can become a threat.

It is one thing when leftists do this. The modern leftist is at root a nihilist. Destruction is their goal so acts of destruction in the guise of ridicule, sarcasm, or intimidation is fully consistent with their mentality. Destruction is their goal, destruction is their tool.

It saddens me when activists on the right start to adopt these same tactics.

Our values of liberty, freedom, independence and peaceable trade among men are life-affirming values, in direct contrast to and opposite the values of the modern left, which are nihilist and life-denying.

When we speak to people of our life-affirming, positive values but do it in a negative, nihilist manner the same as the left - we undercut our own argument. We demolish our own values

The intellectual battle we are in is not a laughing matter. It is not an appropriate subject for childish sarcasm, insults, tearing-down.

It is deadly serious and it will help our cause greatly if we treat life and death matters seriously - and in a positive manner, in accord with the life-affirming nature of our values.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Murder in the US

In 2011, I calculate the overall US murder rate as 4.6 per 100,000 population. But if you recalculate this, and assumed that black men murdered at the same rate as everyone else, the overall rate would drop to 1.9 out of 100,000 population. That would give the United States the 147th highest murder rate in the world - or, the 60th best. The insane disproportionate murder rate among US blacks is why the overall US murder rate seems so high. I don't understand why liberals refuse to talk about this. I don't understand why blacks refuse to talk about this. Blacks are just as often the victim as the offender - almost SIXTY PERCENT of murder victims in the US are black. Shouldn't they care about this? Where are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to talk about this? Yet they are silent. And it's not like this is any secret. This culture of violence, abuse of women, and plain thuggery is paraded around daily in pop music. It's glorified on TV shows like "...

The one thing that could help.

Megan, you overlooked one obvious thing that could help.  More regular, sane, well-adjusted people who are well trained in the use of firearms should be allowed to carry them concealed, in public. The reason the shooters pick malls, schools, restaurants and the like is that they know noone in any of these places will offer them any resistance. Because we have in our "wisdom" banned guns from these places - even by non-crazies. So when crazy shows up to a school there is *no way to stop it*. The meme is "Noone has ever committed a mass murder at a gun show." But it's truth. These shooters are, fundamentally, cowards. They want easy victims, and as you say, a sense of power. So they're going to go to places where we have banned guns and know they will get to exercise that power without resistance. Places that might resist won't give them the sense of power. The obvious solution you overlook, is to encourage, educate, and allow more people to defend thems...

Is Government "just the name we give to things we do together"?

"Government is just the name we give to the things we do together." Well, no. This is a truly deceptive statement. Because look here, there are many, many human institutions where people get together to do things. Churches. Clubs. Corporations. Non-profits. Families. And these all have their own unique characteristics. If government was simply a variety of these, or vice-versa, why would we bother to have a unique word for it? If government were *merely* a charity, wouldn't we just call it a charity? What is it about government then that makes it unique? I'll tell you. It's the use of force. Government is the sole human institution that legitimately exercises physical force against others. Churches don't commit violence. Corporations don't use physical coercion to get you to buy their products or to work for them. Families don't (shouldn't) do that. BECAUSE government's essence is the use of force, government simply should ...